Spotify has been accused of trying to create digital “payola”, after announcing a feature that would give artists an algorithmic boost on the company’s playlists – if they agree to take a cut in the royalties they get paid for the song.
The feature, which Spotify is describing as an “experiment”, will affect playlists including the company’s Artist Radio, which plays songs similar to a particular band, and Autoplay, which continues to play similar music after a playlist has run out of tracks.
“Artists and labels can identify music that is a priority for them, and our system will add that signal to the algorithm that determines personalised listening sessions,” the company said.
“This allows our algorithms to account for what’s important to the artist – perhaps a song they are particularly excited about, an album anniversary they are celebrating, a viral cultural moment they are experiencing, or other factors they care about.”
But the algorithmic juice comes at a price. “To ensure the tool is accessible to artists at any stage of their careers, it will not require any upfront budget,” Spotify says. “Instead, labels or rights holders agree to be paid a promotional recording royalty rate for streams in personalised listening sessions where we provided this service.”
The new terms sparked an immediate backlash among recording artists. “This a form of payola or sponsored social media post. It is not necessarily illegal but the tracks would need to be labelled,” said David C Lowery, the singer-songwriter of Camper Van Beethoven, and a regular campaigner for musicians’ rights, referring to the 1950s scandal of DJs being paid to play particular songs.
Spotify’s push comes just a week after the company was presented with a campaign from the American Union of Musicians and Allied Workers calling for the company to guarantee a minimum payment of 1c per stream, and to “reveal existing payola, then end it altogether”.
“Spotify should not be in the business of selling artists access to their own fan base. Spotify must publicly reveal where existing payola is occurring, and then stop systems of paid access that make an already unequal platform even more imbalanced.”
The letter has been signed by 16,000 artists so far, Umaw says.
Spotify has been contacted for comment.
- Jay Z unveils Tidal, an artist-owned music streaming service
- Sony Music ‘cuts ties with Dr Luke’ three years after Kesha accused him of giving her a date-rape drug and sexually assaulting her
- Central Banks Cut Interest Rates Around Globe
- Caught in the net - the new music industry
- Backstage with streaming giant Spotify
- Spotify agrees to pay back $21 million in royalties
- Led by 'Country Music,' Spotify amplifies Nashville efforts
- Big-name musicians call the music industry to account
- Spotify won’t let you listen to Justin Bieber, Katy Perry and Lady Gaga albums unless you pay for premium service
- Artists Rebel as EU Cracks Down on Royalty Fee Monopolies
- Black Music: The Duke of Earl Gets Into Studio 54
- SXSW showcases music made in Germany
- Presidential candidate Tim Ryan releases album on Spotify
- Modern Country Artist Time Travels With 'Jukebox'
- Will AI change the future of music?
- Germany overtakes the UK to become Europe's largest music market
- Music Midtown Attracts 50,000 Attendees
- Music festivals with less alcohol? Lithuania leads the way
- UA now offering music degree with jazz emphasis
- Country music's identity crisis
Spotify to let artists promote music for cut in royalty rates have 610 words, post on www.theguardian.com at November 3, 2020. This is cached page on Talk Vietnam. If you want remove this page, please contact us.