The recent “informal” summit between President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Wuhan, Central China’s Hubei province, was historic. It was aimed at “resetting” Sino-Indian relationship, which goes back more than two millenniums.
China and India – the second and seventh-largest economies in the world – represent almost 40 percent of the world population. Each is determined to lead the “Asian Century” to drive the engines of global economic growth, while the United States and Europe remain engaged in the 20th century’s outdated game of geopolitics with Russia, especially in the Middle East.
The rapid development and modernization of China has, for example, proven that it can govern its affairs locally and globally with more confidence than what India has accomplished over the years.
With the unprecedented global influence of Beijing’s comprehensive power, Washington has tried to revitalize its old “Indo-Pacific” region’s “quad” strategy of Asian countries of Australia, Japan and India coming together with the US as a unified force to counter China’s rise. Yet Washington’s concerted military strategy would work only if the US has the economic maturity to address the increased defense expenditures and the much-needed infrastructure development to “Make America Great Again.”
For India, a real alliance with the distant US is currently problematic, especially with the Trump administration. The two populous markets of China and India need each other not only for economic reasons, but also because Beijing and New Delhi have traditionally adhered to the nonalignment principle.
As nonaligned countries, both China and India shared a vision of independent national sovereignty – free of the colonial and Cold War mentalities. As practical men of vision, Xi and Modi agreed to hold “heart-to-heart” talks in Wuhan because of their respective national interests, the fear of external powers, and the pride in their civilizations. The two nations might deepen cooperation in trade and investment, as China has been attracting an increasing number of Indian workers, tourists and students.
The border dispute is a big concern for both countries. But the challenges are being managed as India currently views China as a growing military power, surrounded by smaller nations such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka that are economically aligned with Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative. In such a case, India could consider the US as a potential ally to counter China’s assertive behavior.
At this point in time, however, the calculus of being anti-China would not serve well for India whose cooperation with China has greater value on the global stage, especially in climate change and sharing of global commons from which the US has pulled away. Given that India has a highly-decentralized governing system with diverse ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in a noisy democracy, only time will tell whether its, or China’s form of governance with centralized leadership, is more effective in the long run.
Indeed, China’s diversity of ethnic, linguistic, and religions is similar to that of India’s, but it has a different governing model of centralized power. The “China-India reset” could well be a new beginning to transform the most dynamic region into a “pacific” Century of Asia as the power shifts from the West to the East.
The author, a former Rajawali senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School, is an associate-in-research of the Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies at Harvard University as well as a distinguished visiting professor of Asian-Pacific affairs at Shandong University and a senior fellow of the Pangoal Institution.
- Israel leads the global vaccine race with 24/7, 150,000-dose-a-day drive that has already inoculated 7% of its population - but the UK is third and has delivered more jabs in total
- Asian nations toughen virus curbs as Europe fights new strain
- Yearender: Bringing multi-dimensional connectivity, Belt and Road means a lot to many Asian countries
- China lab leak is the 'most credible' source of the coronavirus outbreak, says top US government official, amid bombshell claims Wuhan scientist has turned whistleblower
- Biggest Bay Area news stories of 2020? In a year ruled by pandemic, other important narratives broke out
- What will define the New Year: Here's A to Z of 2021
- 42 Books That Helped People Get Through This Garbage Year
- The 100 best science photos of 2020
- Coronavirus digest: China approves first COVID-19 vaccine
- China's coronavirus black hole: How secret policemen and communist censors enforce cloak of secrecy on bat caves where Covid-19 may have started... eight years after mystery pneumonia killed three mine workers
- Yes, Britain CAN spring back! Broadcasting titan ANDREW NEIL gives his uplifting vision of a post-Brexit boom (as long as Boris doesn't mess it up)
- Covid-19: China clamps down in hidden hunt for coronavirus origins
- VIETNAM NEWS JANUARY 8
- Coronavirus live updates: Southern California hospitals ‘in crisis,’ state health leader says
- WHO says coronavirus is not necessarily 'the big one' and a more deadly pandemic could sweep the globe
- Coronavirus live updates: With new pandemic aid coming, House to vote on raising checks to $2,000
- One year on: What have we learned since news of COVID-19 first broke?
- In memoriam: Remembering sports persons who passed away in 2020
- Subramanian Swamy: China, India must cease hostilities
- 100 Highly Anticipated Movies Coming Out in 2021
Will the Wuhan 'reset' lead to 'Asian Century'? have 847 words, post on www.thejakartapost.com at May 14, 2018. This is cached page on Talk Vietnam. If you want remove this page, please contact us.