Efforts are underway to ensure the healthy performance of banks.
Senior banking expert Nguyen Tri Hieu said the listing of banks would be effective in increasing transparency.
In doing so, besides the requirement to release quarterly financial statements, banks will be obligated to announce unexpected shifts in performance and disclose information at the request of management authorities. Bank operations will be under the oversight of investors and the public.
According to veteran economist Bui Kien Thanh, if banks submit their financial information and ownership structures on bourses, it will improve transparency and pave the way for the SBV to gradually lessen the current entangled cross-holding situation between banks.
In fact, transparency is a major reason banks are hesitant to list.
At this time, apart from eight listed banks meeting information requirements, many banks have yet to deliver their information as per regulations. Some banks have even failed to submit any information at all since their incorporation.
“It is perilous for shareholding banks to keep their operations secret, as nobody knows where their money flows into or from. In the coming time, the SBV needs to introduce more explicit regulations governing banks’ financial transparency, whether they are listed or not,” said a source from a Vietnam-based foreign investment fund.
Numerous banks such as Maritime, Southern and NamA released plans to list years ago, but they have been delayed due to the banks claiming “unfavourable market conditions”.
According to economists, apart from market and information transparency factors, another reason banks cannot list was considerable bad debts.
Pursuant to an SBV circular guiding listing procedures, to enter a bourse banks need to satisfy several requirements such as having a chartered capital of at least VND3 trillion ($142 million), generating profits over the previous two years, and bad debts of less than 3 per cent of total outstanding loans in the two quarters running up to their listing.
Banks also need to unflinchingly follow capital adequacy regulations, as well as those on debt classification, provisioning, internal auditing, and control systems.
Meeting these stringent requirements is likely to be a strain on banks given the current context.
By Ha Tamcomments powered by Disqus